A better route planer bietet die Funktion zwischen der eigenen "abstrakten" Map und Satelittenbild hin und her zu schalten.
Beiträge von flowminister
-
-
Laut Auskunft von Skoda EV Lounge startet die Aktion in Österreich eine Woche später, am 30. Juni .. Gründe wurden keine genannt. Vielleicht will der Generalimporteur zuerst Erfahrungen aus den anderen Länden abwarten ..
Danke, das sind ja halbwegs gute News. Mir wurde gerade mein Termin nächste Woche storniert weil noch nichts im System ist. Hoffe das passt dann nächste Woche. Danke nochmals fürs Nachfragen!
-
Auch meine Werkstatt wusste von nichts. Kein Update für mein Auto vorhanden. Er selbst kennt diese Maßnahme auch gar nicht. Also wiedermal schlechte Kommunikation (Skoda Österreich)
Ist bei mir auch Österreich. Wird also wohl mit Skoda Österreich zusammenhängen
-
Mein Autohaus hat mich gerade zurückgerufen und sie sehen bei meinem Mai 2021er Modell noch nichts.
-
Dann hast Du einfach Pech. Das musste ich in 2 Jahren genau einmal.
In der modernen Softwareentwicklung sollte "Pech" kein Argument mehr sein. Ein Softwareunternehmen wie Cariad sollte größtes Interesse an den Fehlern haben da der Code an einer Stelle nicht unter Kontrolle ist. Und hierfür gibt es unterschiedlichste Möglichkeiten (wo auch Semantic Versioning wieder mitspielt) und du kannst Änderungen so auch recht gut eingegrenzt liefern ohne Querschläger zu produzieren. Die Strategien sind nicht neu und sind heutzutage Standard.
Meiner fällt auch immer wieder aus. aber da ich selbst aus der Branche bin kann ich nur dafür plädieren Fehler zu beseitigen. Macht man sowas nicht, wird es immer undurchsichtiger und problematischer.
-
Ist doch nicht nur ein VW Problem.
Bei Android gab es vor Jahren einen Sprung um mehrere ganzzahlige Versionsnummern, um an iOS oder damals noch iPhone OS vorbeizuziehen. Und jetzt versucht man sich an einer Art Parallelflug.
Das können Andere also auch.
Und schlussendlich ist es egal, ob die SW 3.0.7 oder 3.6 oder 3.7 heißt. Laufen muss sie. Und das tut sie. Manchmal ruckelig, Einzelne haben Probleme, Manche stilisieren Sachen zu einem watergate-ähnlichen Skandal hoch.
So ist der Mensch eben.
Das hat doch nichts mit "die anderen haben auch Blödsinn gemacht" zu tun. Die haben alle daraus gelernt. Und ein vernünftiges und nachvollziehbares Versionsmanagement macht die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den einzelnen Einheiten einfacher und vorallem nachvollziehbar. Manchmal verlassen ja auch Leute ein Unternehmen und andere kommen hinzu. Sauber zu Arbeiten hat mit Softwarequalität zu tun. Anders gesagt, es nicht zu tun sagt auch etwas über Qualität aus.
-
The existing Audi Q4 vehicles are based on MEB and, as far as I know, are identical to the VW ID, Skoda Enyaq and Cupra Born. Only Audi etron has other components.
At the beginning of the year I contacted the new CEO of Cariad, he is happy with pre-heating and wrote to me that he is checking what ME3.x looks like.
Would have seen it the same up to now. There is MEB platform which comes with a sort of framework or middleware that is not adaptable - although I guess overwriting code would be possible. But this could have deeper unforseeable impact and create ricochets. But the framework can be used through the APIs provided and on this Cariad and Audi put different infotainment systems. And here Cariad could simply reuse the configuration of Audi (and they could even get it as pseudocode or function/technical design) as its just about the control parameter. But if they really changed control units of MEB thats a different thing. Still I would wonder if they really did that. Would really mean its 2-classes of MEB usage.
-
Alles anzeigen
It's important to mention here that Audi is using the extended Android Automotive OS to manage both the infotainment and hardware components in the car. This is far away from the current ME 3.X systems found in VW and Skoda.
There are some changes in the battery structure of the Enyaq ME2024, which is why the system can more easily preheat the battery. The battery structure is also slightly different, making the process more straightforward. It's not fair to directly compare Skoda/VW with Audi and Porsche. Audi and Porsche have more autonomy and are actively shaping the future with the latest technologies. Skoda is still considered an affordable car and not necessarily the favorite kid in the neighborhood of VW concern.
Yes, correct.
This can give others an idea of what their ME 3.X will be like once Skoda contacts them. It should still be in Q1 or the beginning of Q2, pending approval from the wonderful folks in Wolfsburg.
Don't expect too much; it's a small update to bring your car to the latest version. Skoda aims to have everyone on ME 3.7 to facilitate the delivery of more updates in the future—primarily smaller updates, with no major changes expected at this time.
And I have to remain quiet for now. More things will be shared... Soon™.
Is Audi really adapting the control units software differently to the rest of MEB? thats an interesting new info if so (at least for me).
-
Audi uses a different infotainment, different software.
But I agree, sharing that part of the source code within the same holding should't be an issue.
Agreed. For me its only about hardware limitations - that can´t be true or not acceptable if one party has found a working solution. Not providing the feature in software through Cariad can only have 2 possibilities: Having not the ability in development (workaround: Let you inspire from the working source code) or not wanting/not beeing allowed from mgmt (selling more new cars, differentiation between cars,...). From all infos we currently have, it clearly points to second possibility.
-
Alles anzeigen
This is technically almost correct, but there are a few more aspects to consider. WLTP is one of the explanations that people, and even employees from within, receive as an answer. However, they have discovered that this excuse is no longer acceptable, especially since many other car manufacturers have implemented preheating for their cars in the past (oh, hello Kia EV6, can I choose you instead of my Enyaq?).
There is a minor issue with the hardware itself. The battery in the "older" Enyaq is only heated from one side. If you refer to the technical drawing of the battery, you'll understand that it's being heated solely from the bottom, which can lead to problems with proper heating. Another concern that I and a few others have noticed is that the "heaters" responsible for battery heating may face challenges during winter temperatures, as they are exposed to cold wind, snow, water, and other elements, even with underbody protection.
[Blockierte Grafik: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1025315373916114974/1192562613830303804/image0.jpg]
However, the most significant issue is not related to the hardware. Skoda is advocating for preheating, but it seems they are the only ones. Unfortunately, it's up to Cariad and VW to decide which features will be implemented in ME 3.X systems. After discussing this with a few people from the team, it appears that Skoda is quite desperate, given the increasing inquiries from customers.
The topic itself is not closed yet. We won't see it implemented this year for sure. The software update to a higher version is currently the priority, but that's a separate discussion.
What I don´t get: Audi Q4 seems to have preheating at least when you a charger from the Navi according to some colleague. Software is different but the technical limitations should be the same. Or is Audi using different Hardware. And from what I read and understood the new MY2024 Enyaqs have pretty the same heating system. So to me this can only be Software limitations in the end. I mean it can´t be that hard to get the configuration (that seems to be not dangerous for old platform) from Audi for preheating if it works there with same hardware. Working for a big group too and there is always a way to get important source code shared from other units if it is needed for the customer.
